Skip to main content
Aggregate arXiv cs.AI 人工智能 24 Aug 2026 - 13:30

Volumetric Radiology AI in the Era of Multimodal Large Language Models

RSS 官方收录 · 可信分层展示

关键摘要

arXiv:2608.…

  • 20549v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Advances in multimodal large lang…
  • Volumetric radiology, however, presents a fundamental representational…
  • Reliable volumetric radiology AI therefore requires representations th…

摘要引擎:抽取

正文提要

arXiv:2608.20549v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Advances in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are extending radiological artificial intelligence (AI) beyond task-specific image analysis toward multimodal understanding and reasoning. Volumetric radiology, however, presents a fundamental representational mismatch: clinical interpretation often requires full-volume spatial context and acquisition-dependent quantitative information, whereas current MLLMs are commonly conditioned on selected two-dimensional (2D) images, compressed visual representations, or report-derived text. Reliable volumetric radiology AI therefore requires representations that preserve task-relevant three-dimensional (3D) information and systems that can access, verify, and integrate this information across clinical workflows. In this Review, we examine more than 200 publications through July 2026. We organize the literature around volumetric representation and multimodal understanding at the model level, agentic orchestration at the system level, and their links to clinical applications and evaluation. We review volumetric foundation models, language alignment and compression strategies, and agentic systems that extend MLLMs through planning, tools, memory, and workflow interaction. We distinguish settings in which selected 2D views or report-mediated reasoning may suffice from those that warrant native volumetric modeling. We also introduce a Claim-Design-Validation framework to assess whether technical, workflow, and clinical claims are matched by appropriate design and validation. Across the literature, native volumetric modeling and agentic capabilities depend on the spatial, quantitative, contextual, and workflow requirements of the intended task. Clinical credibility requires faithful volumetric representation, traceable system behavior, claim-aligned validation, and clearly defined human oversight in realistic workflows.

来源:https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.20549

打开官方原文 站点原文页 可信分区 本信源更多 今日简报 分享图 RSS 稍后再看列表