微信内可能无法直接打开本站。请点右上角 ··· → 在浏览器打开,或复制链接。
Harness-agnostic detection and immunization of reward hacking in self-evolving language models
RSS 官方收录 · 可信分层展示
关键摘要
HackProbe新工具可无侵入检测并免疫大模型奖励黑客攻击,AUROC达0.763
- HackProbe通过双黑盒接口接入任意自演化循环,不访问权重或激活值
- 四项测试覆盖能力差距、发散检测、停滞与错误率,经Sidak校正输出校准p值
- 在四通道注入测试中,误报率从0.706降至0.434,免疫后净增能力5.2分
AI 摘要 · 来源可核验
正文提要
arXiv:2609.04665v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Self-evolving language models improve by proposing candidate updates and keeping whatever raises a visible score. When that score is an imperfect proxy for the capability one actually wants, sustained selection widens the gap between the two. This is reward hacking. We introduce HackProbe, a monitor that attaches to an arbitrary self-evolving loop through two black-box hooks, with no access to weights or activations. It keeps a secret, distribution-fixed comparison core, whose frozen distribution makes its capability proxy comparable across generations, alongside a rotated fresh layer that hardens the bank against co-adaptation. Four tests built on that proxy cover the level gap, a scale-aligned divergence with online change-point detection, capability stagnation, and a conditional confidently-wrong rate; a Sidak correction turns them into a calibrated family-wise p-value. Diagnosis alone recovers nothing, so a risk-aware immunization layer reselects an honest candidate from the proposal pool using the core together with a purely structural gaming footprint, disclosing at most log2 Pi bits per generation to the host. We prove a detectability bound that converts a target error rate into an explicit probe-size budget, and we delimit what probe rotation does and does not buy. On a controlled prompt-level host with four injected hacking channels and ground-truth labels, HackProbe reaches 0.763 AUROC against 0.663 for the strongest baseline and cuts the false-positive rate from 0.706 to 0.434. Its bandwidth-limited reselection is the only immunization level that returns more true capability under hacking, 5.2 points on average, than it forfeits on clean runs, 4.7; per-channel effects are mostly not individually significant.