微信内可能无法直接打开本站。请点右上角 ··· → 在浏览器打开,或复制链接。
ERPBench: Evaluating LLM Agents for Enterprise Decision-Making Across Competitive Market Ecologies
RSS 官方收录 · 可信分层展示
关键摘要
ERPBench测试100个LLM在两种竞争生态中的企业决策能力,6模型家族共1200条轨迹
- ERPBench是首个支持跨竞争市场生态对比的企业决策代理基准
- 含Solo(对规则对手)和Arena(6个LLM同场竞争)两种生态,各测100个固定问题
- DeepSeek在Solo领先,Gemini在Arena领先,仅21/100问题结果一致
AI 摘要 · 来源可核验
正文提要
arXiv:2609.04667v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly proposed for enterprise workflows, yet existing evaluations rarely test whether business-decision conclusions transfer across competitive market ecologies. We introduce ERPBench, an execution-instrumented benchmark for enterprise decision agents in a six-round Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) simulation with coupled pricing, production, procurement, inventory, finance, and shared-market competition. ERPBench evaluates the same 100 fixed problems in two matched competitive market ecologies: Solo, where each evaluated LLM agent competes against fixed rule-based opponents, and Arena, where six evaluated LLM agents compete in a shared market. Across six model families, this yields 1,200 model-level trajectories spanning 7,200 decision rounds. Under the observed service configuration, the leading model differs between ecologies: DeepSeek leads in Solo (252.29M mean valuation; mean rank 1.67), whereas Gemini leads in Arena (263.95M; 1.76). The two ecologies identify the same task-level winner on only 21 of 100 problems, and Gemini's bottom-rank rate falls from 22 % to 0 % in Arena. ERPBench supports paired evaluation of whether enterprise-agent rankings transfer across competitive market ecologies, supplemented by aggregate execution-intervention analysis. Code and benchmark resources are available in our https://github.com/GAIR-NLP/erp-bench.