微信内可能无法直接打开本站。请点右上角 ··· → 在浏览器打开,或复制链接。
Beyond Effectiveness: A Multi-Criteria Framework for Comparing Practical Socio-Technical Interventions
RSS 官方收录 · 可信分层展示
关键摘要
arXiv:2608.…
- 20649v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Designers and policymakers in soc…
- Prior work tends to evaluate interventions individually and mostly alo…
- We present a multi-criteria framework for evaluating sociotechnical in…
摘要引擎:抽取
正文提要
arXiv:2608.20649v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Designers and policymakers in sociotechnical domains like content moderation, privacy interfaces, recommender systems and beyond, must choose among a growing menu of proposed interventions, but typically lack a principled basis for comparing them. Prior work tends to evaluate interventions individually and mostly along the effectiveness criteria, while implementation constraints such as cost, effort and feasibility are often considered separately. We present a multi-criteria framework for evaluating sociotechnical interventions. This framework is instantiated through the case of misinformation, a domain of intense focus for proposed countermeasures. We survey $N=39$ researchers on 40 operationalized interventions across five evaluative criteria: political feasibility, effectiveness, user acceptance, cost, and implementation effort. We find that the interventions that experts judge to be the most effective are not always the most acceptable to the public or the most feasible to implement. We also discuss how this tension has implications for the design of sociotechnical interventions beyond misinformation, and offer a decision framework for practitioners navigating the trade-offs of sociotechnical interventions.