微信内可能无法直接打开本站。请点右上角 ··· → 在浏览器打开,或复制链接。
Does the Selected Object Reach the Reader? Auditing Identity Handoffs in Grounded Language-Model Pipelines
RSS 官方收录 · 可信分层展示
关键摘要
审计600个HybridQA问题发现:26.6%情况下BM25检索丢失目标对象
- BM25在5条截断下遗漏目标对象389次(26.6%)
- 混合重排检索仅遗漏14次(1.0%)
- 目标对象存在与否使准确率相差28.6–31.0分
AI 摘要 · 来源可核验
正文提要
arXiv:2609.04579v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Grounded language-model pipelines can be divided into three stages: selecting an object, retrieving passages for it, and using that evidence to answer. If the selected object must reach the reader, losing it breaks the handoff. Benchmark recall checks the dataset-linked object, which can differ. We audit 600 HybridQA questions across three selector families. On 1,463 resolvable records where the selected object matches the dataset-traced passage, exact key lookup and exact title matching return the object every time. With every ranked rule given the same decoded selected title, body-only BM25 omits it on 389 records (26.6%) at cutoff five, while hybrid retrieval with reranking omits it on 14 (1.0%). The two identities differ on 329 of 1,792 resolvable records. With original-question rankings, their top-five checks disagree on 106 records (5.9%). Frozen reader comparisons associate the aligned object's presence with 28.6 to 31.0 points higher exact match. In a deliberately selected 64-item cohort, removing that passage sharply lowers exact match, while removing a similar-length comparison passage does not reproduce the drop. We release the Returned-Object Profile (ROP), an executable record of the target, returned-ID field, cutoff, membership rule, and complete expected population, with data and an offline replay.