微信内可能无法直接打开本站。请点右上角 ··· → 在浏览器打开,或复制链接。
Can Frontier LLMs Match Natively Multimodal Embeddings? A Comparison on Hard-Negative Text-to-Image Retrieval
RSS 官方收录 · 可信分层展示
关键摘要
arXiv:2608.…
- 11343v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal retrieval and classifi…
- The March 2026 release of Gemini Embedding 2, Google's first natively …
- Simultaneously, frontier Large language models (LLMs) have also demons…
摘要引擎:抽取
正文提要
arXiv:2608.11343v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal retrieval and classification across different types of media, spanning text, images,video and audio, has traditionally relied on dual-encoder models that align visual and textual representations through contrastive learning. The March 2026 release of Gemini Embedding 2, Google's first natively multimodal embedding model to map text, images, video, audio, and documents into a single shared space, raises competition among multimodal retrieval systems. Simultaneously, frontier Large language models (LLMs) have also demonstrated strong visual understanding, raising the question of whether they can serve as effective zero-shot rankers. Our study provides the first direct comparison of native multimodal embeddings against LLM-based visual ranking on Flickr30k. We observe that GPT-4.1 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 perform on par with Gemini Embedding 2. Additionally, once embeddings are precomputed, multimodal embeddings are better suited for low-latency applications.